Increased hospital case volume is associated with improved survival and quality of care for uterine corpus cancer in Belgium

Vanbraband J, Van Damme N, Silversmit G, De Geyndt A, Herreros-Pomares A, Bouche G, Jacomen G, de Jonge E, Goffin F, Denys H, Amant F
Date de publication
Nom du journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Objective: This study aimed to prospectively evaluate whether hospital case volume is positively associated with both the outcome and the quality of care of uterine corpus cancer in Belgium.

 

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, registration-based, real-world database study. Hospital case volume was categorized according to the total number of patients treated on average per year: low (<10/y), medium (10-19/y), and high (≥20/y). Adjusting for patient case mix and intra-hospital correlations, logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to test for associations between hospital case volume and a multi-disciplinary set of process and outcome indicators. Sub-group analyses by recurrence risk were performed for overall survival and disease-free survival.

 

Results: In total, 4178 patients diagnosed with a primary cancer of the uterine corpus between 2012 and 2016 in Belgium were included. Compared with patients treated in high-volume hospitals, patients treated in low-volume hospitals were more likely to die of any cause within 5 years after diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio 1.37, p < .01), as were patients treated in medium-volume hospitals (adjusted hazard ratio 1.18, p < .05). Similar results were observed in the sub-group analyses, but only among patients with high-intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. In contrast, hazards for disease-free survival did not differ by hospital case volume, neither in the total study population nor in the sub-group analyses by recurrence risk. Furthermore, analysis of the process indicators showed that patients treated in low- and medium-volume hospitals were less likely to receive multiple guideline-recommended procedures compared with those treated in high-volume hospitals, including minimally invasive surgery, surgical lymph node staging, staging omentectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

 

Conclusions: On average, increased hospital case volume was positively associated with improved overall survival and quality of care, supporting centralization of uterine corpus cancer care into high-volume reference centers in Belgium.